Internationally renowned as the "father of Futurism" in his native Ukraine and in Russia, David Burliuk was a major contributor to the seminal period of modernism in the early decades of the 20th century.
Burliuk was born in 1882 near the city of Kharkiv in eastern Ukraine. He studied in Odesa and Kazan (1898-1902), at the Munich Royal Academy of Arts (1902-1903), and at the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris (1904). His exuberant, extroverted character was recognized by Anton Azhbe, his professor at the Munich Academy, who called Burliuk a “wonderful wild steppe horse.”
 |
| David Burliuk seated center |
Burliuk’s art during his historically important early period was an amalgam of Fauvist, Cubist, and Futurist influences, which he absorbed and melded with his love of nature, a fascination for the forms and designs of Scythian culture (he formed and named the literary-artistic group “Hylaea” — the Greek name for ancient Scythian lands), and especially his admiration for Ukrainian folklore. Among his favorites was the legend of Mamai, a Cossack who embodied Burliuk’s own vision of bravery, self-sufficiency, and rugged individualism.
During these years, Burliuk was an active participant in important avant-garde exhibitions in Kyiv, Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Munich. From December 1913 to April 1914, the notoriety of Burliuk’s Futurists reached its peak as Burliuk, Vladimir Maiakovsky, and Vasily Kamensky toured 17 cities in the Empire. The appearance of the Futurists (they liked to wear gaudy waistcoats, sometimes painted animals on their faces, and wore carrots in their lapels) and their "performances," which included drinking tea on stage under a suspended piano, drew packed audiences, scandalized many, but also won converts to the new art. Burliuk’s life-affirming energy, his creative force, and his celebration of the new — all left a lasting impact on the history of modernism.
 |
| David Burliuk |
Burliuk’s art and life after his tumultuous early period would take him to many and varied places. During the revolutionary years 1917-1920, he traveled to Siberia, where he gave Futurist concerts and sold his art. From 1920 to 1922 he spent time in Japan painting, organizing exhibitions, and promoting Futurism. In 1922, Burliuk arrived in the United States, settling first in New York City, where he lived from 1922 to 1941, and then in Hampton Bays, Long Island (1941-1967).
The inspiration for Burliuk’s later career is found in his love of vitality in all its forms — biological, psychological, and cultural. Whether he was painting his native Ukrainian steppe, Japanese landscapes, Long Island fishing villages, or the streets of New York, he searched for the energy that vibrated and flowed through scenes. They suggest the existence of hidden patterns just beyond human perception.
 |
| David Burliuk & wife, Marusia, Moscow, 1965 |
He was, in the end, a worshiper of the earth’s abundance and glory as much as a Futurist scandalizer of public taste. It is not surprising that one of his favorite artists was Vincent van Gogh, whose impassioned vision of nature, tendered with brilliant color and vigorous stroke, Burliuk admired greatly.
Burliuk’s deep involvement in the world also manifests itself in his important works focused on ideological, philosophical themes dealing with war and the human condition.
David Burliuk died on Long Island in 1967. That same year he was honored posthumously by being inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Letters.
His works
Human Trafficking
Trafficking in persons is a serious crime and a grave violation of human
rights. Every year, thousands of men, women and children fall into the hands of
traffickers, in their own countries and abroad. Almost every country in the
world is affected by trafficking, whether as a country of origin, transit or
destination for victims. Trafficking in Persons as the recruitment,
transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of persons, by means of the
threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of
deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the
giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person
having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation.
Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution
of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services,
slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.
Malaysia
The Situation
Malaysia is a destination, and to a lesser extent, a source and transit country
for men, women, and children who are subjected to conditions of forced labor,
and women and children subjected to sex trafficking.
Source
A small number of Malaysian citizens are reportedly trafficked internally and
abroad to Singapore, China, and Japan for commercial sexual exploitation.
Malaysians from rural and indigenous communities tend to be more vulnerable to
trafficking.
Destination
The overwhelming majority of trafficking victims are among the two million
documented and 1.9 million undocumented foreign workers in Malaysia from
various countries including Indonesia, Nepal, India, Thailand, China, the
Philippines, Burma, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Vietnam. Many victims
migrate willingly to Malaysia seeking employment opportunities in plantations,
construction sites, textile factories, and as domestic workers but subsequently
encounter forced labor or debt bondage at the hands of their employers, employment
agents, or informal labor recruiters. While many of Malaysia’s trafficking
offenders are individual business people, large organized crime syndicates are
also behind trafficking.
A significant number of young foreign women
are recruited for work in Malaysian restaurants and hotels, some of whom
migrate through the use of “Guest Relations Officer” visas, but subsequently
are coerced into Malaysia’s commercial sex trade.
Domestic workers are particularly vulnerable.
Local NGOs estimate that for every domestic servant legally employed in
Malaysia there is one working in the country illegally and many may be
trafficked.
Ninety percent of these domestic servants are
from Indonesia. This is concerning, as a 2006 MOU between Indonesia and
Malaysia allows for Malaysian employers to confiscate passports of domestic
employees, which is widely recognized as increasing a migrant’s vulnerability.
Internal Trafficking
Statelessness, a recognized human trafficking vulnerability factor, remains an
issue in Malaysia. Citizenship is derived from one's parents; however, many
children are stateless because the government refuses to register their birth
due to inadequate proof of their parents' marriage. Interfaith marriages are
also not recognized by the government which sometimes results in undocumented,
de facto stateless children. One NGO estimates that the number of stateless
persons ranges from several thousand to as many as 30,000. Without birth
certificates, government officials deny stateless persons access to education,
health care, and the right to own property. This puts them at risk
of seeking unofficial employment opportunities, thus putting these people at
risk of trafficking.
The Malaysian Government
The Malaysian Government was placed on Tier 2 Watch List for a second
consecutive year in the 2011
U.S. Department of State’s Trafficking in Persons Report for not fully complying with the
Trafficking Victims Protection Act’s minimum standards for the elimination of
trafficking. However, the US Government recognizes that the Malaysian
Government is making significant efforts to do so.
The government has increased the number of
convictions obtained under the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling
of Migrants Act during 2010 and continues public awareness efforts on
trafficking. However, it has not effectively investigated and prosecuted labor
trafficking cases, has failed to address problems of government complicity in
trafficking, and lacks provision of effective victim care and counseling by
authorities. There remain many serious concerns regarding trafficking in
Malaysia, including the detention of trafficking victims in government
facilities.
Prosecution
Malaysian law
prohibits all forms of human trafficking through its Anti-Trafficking in
Persons Act, which was amended in November 2010 to broaden the definition of
trafficking to include all actions involved in acquiring or maintaining the
labor or services of a person through coercion.
Authorities reported initiating 174 charges
against 51 individuals under the anti-trafficking law in 2010. The government
convicted 11 sex trafficking offenders and three individuals involved in labor
trafficking, sentencing them to three to eight years’ imprisonment; this is
compared to seven trafficking offenders convicted during the previous year. The
government also reported that 141 trafficking cases remain pending in Malaysian
courts.
The acquittal rate of alleged trafficking
offenders was 68 percent during 2010, a rate attributed by observers to the
lack of adequate victim-witness protection, victim assistance incentives, and
poor judicial training on human trafficking.
NGOs have reported that the police often fail
or refuse to investigate complaints of confiscation of passports and travel
documents or withholding of wages – especially with regards to domestic workers
– as possible trafficking offenses. The government did not report in 2010 any
criminal prosecutions of employers who subjected workers to conditions of
forced labor or labor recruiters who used deceptive practices and debt bondage
to compel migrant workers into involuntary servitude. Nor were any government
officials convicted of trafficking-related complicity in 2010, even though
there are reports of collusion between police and trafficking offenders.
Protection
Victim protection efforts remain inadequate in Malaysia. Victims identified by
Malaysian authorities are adjudicated under a “protective order” that triggers
their forcible detention in “shelters,” where some are isolated, unable to work
or earn income, and have little or no access to legal or psychological
assistance provided by the government or NGOs.
Furthermore, the government treats victims of
trafficking as illegal aliens and turns them over to immigration authorities
for deportation after they provide evidence to prosecutors, usually after a
90-day stay at a trafficking in persons “shelter.” While the government reports
that it encourages victims to assist in the prosecution of their traffickers,
it does not make available any alternatives to repatriation for victims who may
face harm or retribution upon return to their home country. Nor does it provide
any incentives for victim cooperation. In fact, during trial proceedings, authorities
often do not make adequate efforts to separate victims from their traffickers,
which may result in threats to the victims and their families if they cooperate
with police and prosecutors.
Prevention
The November 2010,
amendments to the anti-trafficking law included the Labor Department within the
Ministry of Human Resources as an enforcement agency. The Ministry has since
reported that it now requires foreign domestic workers and their employers to
attend a compulsory half-day seminar on workers’ rights and that a portion of a
domestic worker’s salary must be placed into a bank account in the employee’s
name in order to provide a record of payment.
The Malaysian Home Ministry reported
investigating the 277 outsourcing companies that recruit foreign workers into
Malaysia and placed 42 on a watch list for engaging in suspicious activities.
The Women’s Ministry continues to produce pamphlets about indicators of
trafficking, which are distributed at border checkpoints. The government also
continues to implement an anti-trafficking public awareness campaign in print
media, on the radio, and on television.
However, international organizations and NGOs
report that the lack of understanding of human trafficking by many Malaysian
front-line officers, such as police and immigration officers, continue to
hinder the identification and proper investigation of trafficking cases and
identification and assistance to trafficking victims.
International Cooperation
The Indonesian
Government has been negotiating with the Malaysian Government to amend the 2006
MOU which allows employers to confiscate passports from migrant workers.
However, talks were stalled in 2010 reportedly due to an impasse on the issue
of a minimum wage and a weekly day off, which the government of Indonesia is
demanding for domestic workers.
Recommendations
The U.S. Department of
State recommends that the Malay Government enact the following measures in its
2011 TIP Report:
·
Increase law
enforcement actions under the anti-trafficking law, particularly labor
trafficking cases;
·
Apply stringent
criminal penalties to those involved in fraudulent labor recruitment or forced
labor;
·
Increase efforts to
prosecute and convict public officials who profit from or are involved in
trafficking, or who exploit victims;
·
Develop and implement
procedures to identify labor trafficking victims among vulnerable groups such
as migrant workers and refer them to available protection services;
·
Improve victim
protection in government facilities by providing victims legal assistance, and
providing effective counseling and care to the victims of trafficking;
·
Develop and implement
mechanisms to allow adult foreign trafficking victims to travel, work, and
reside outside of government shelters;
·
Provide legal
alternatives to the removal of trafficking victims to countries in which they
would face retribution or hardship; ensure that victims of trafficking are not
threatened or punished for crimes committed as a result of being
trafficked;
·
Make greater efforts
to educate migrant workers on their rights, legal recourses available, and how
to seek remedies against traffickers or employers who fail to meet their legal
obligations;
·
Re-negotiate MOUs with
source countries to incorporate victim protection and remove authorizations for
employers to confiscate passports or travel documents;
·
Continue to train
officials on the effective handling of sex and labor trafficking cases, with a
particular emphasis on victim protection and the identification of labor
trafficking victims;
·
Make efforts to reduce
the demand for both sex and labor trafficking; and
·
Expand the
anti-trafficking awareness campaign to encompass both labor and sex
trafficking.